solution finder

2018 أبريل 27

National Award Scheme for Sanitation for Indian Cities

المؤلف*
Sreevidya Satish (Ecosan Services Foundation)
المُلخص التنفيذي
The Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD) introduced in November 2009 a new benchmarking tool and award scheme, aiming to address poor sanitation conditions in India’s urban areas. The scheme supports implementation of the National Urban Sanitation Policy (NUSP), which seeks to mobilise governments and civil society to transform urban India into community-driven Nirmal Shahars, or totally sanitised, healthy, and liveable cities and towns. The MoUD together with partners carried out a study to rank 423 cities on a set of indicators for sanitation and healthy living (MOUD 2010, Rank of Cities). These cities were divided into five zones, representing 72 per cent of India’s urban population. The rankings are based on 19 sanitation parameters such as access to community toilets, safe management of human excreta, and solid waste collection and treatment. Four colour codes have been assigned to the cities based on the points they obtained in the rating: red means the cities need 'immediate remedial action', black means 'need considerable improvement', blue means ‘recovering’, green means ‘healthy and clean’. A 'healthy and green city' would have required a score between 91 and 100.
Disclaimer: Links within the texts to additional information, concepts and tools are SSWM editor’s inputs and might not represent the view or practices of GIZ.
Factsheet Block Title
Introduction
Factsheet Block Body

India made considerable progress after the launch of the National Urban Sanitation Policy (NUSP) in 2008. Further to this action, State Sanitation Strategies were made in 8 states and more than 120 City Sanitation Plans (see City Sanitation Plans according to the NUSP) are prepared with funding assistance from Ministry of Urban Development and external agencies like GIZ, JICA, UN Habitat, USAID and WSP.

In order to recognise excellent performance in promoting urban sanitation, the Government of India has instituted a rating of cities on urban sanitation indicators based on which best performers will be awarded the 'Nirmal Shahar Puraskar' (exemplary city award) at a national ceremony. The ratings aim to improve public health and environmental standards as to the outcomes that cities must seek to ensure for their citizens. In doing so, governments need to plan and implement holistic city-wide sanitation plans. The rating will not recognise mere inputs, hardware or expenditure incurred in urban sanitation, but will assess how these have lead to achievements of intermediate milestones (MOUD 2008).

Factsheet Block Title
Goal of Nirmal Puraskar
Factsheet Block Body

The goal of Nirmal Shahar Puraskar is to encourage cities to strive for 100 per cent access to sanitation facilities to all cities (see also sanitation systems) and 100 per cent safe disposal of all city generated waste (see also the chapters wastewater collection, wastewater treatment, reuse and recharge, and solid waste management). The rating and award is based on the premise that improved public health and environmental standards are two outcomes that cities must ensure for urban citizens. In doing so, the state governments and urban areas must adopt a holistic, citywide approach while incorporating processes that help reach outputs pertaining to goals of the National Urban Sanitation Policy (NUSP) (see also sustainable sanitation). 

The NUSP is operationalised on the basis of technical and financial assistance provided to States from the Government of India (GoI) in developing and implementing State Level Sanitation Strategies and introducing a prestigious National level Reward Scheme for Cities (Nirmal Shahar Puraskar) achieving measurable milestones in becoming sanitised, liveable Nirmal Shahars.

Factsheet Block Title
Concept of Totally Sanitised Cities
Factsheet Block Body

A totally sanitised city will be one that has achieved the outputs or milestones specified in the National Urban Sanitation Policy, the salient features of which areas follows (MOUD 2010):

  • Cities must be open-defecation free and provide access to toilets for poor people.
  • Must eliminate the practise of manual scavenging and provide adequate personnel protection equipment that addresses safety of sanitation workers (see also invalid link).
  • All wastewater should be safely collected, treated and disposed.
  • Recycle/reuse of treated wastewater for non-potable purposes should be implemented wherever possible (see also reuse and recharge).
  • Solid waste collected and disposed safely (see also solid waste management).
  • Services to the poor and systems for sustaining results.
  • Improved public health outcomes and environmental standards (see also water pollution, sanitation and health, and invalid link).
Factsheet Block Title
Methodology and Process for Rating of Cities, 2010
Factsheet Block Body

The first round of the rating of cities was conducted between December 2009 and April 2010 under the guidance of the National Advisory Group on Urban Sanitation (NAGUS) and in consultations with the state governments and urban local bodies (ULBs). All 436 Class I cities have been rated and this will be scaled-up to cover the remaining urban centres in the subsequent rounds. The 436 cities include metros, Big Class I cities and Other Class I cities, covering almost 72 per cent of India's total urban population.

Distribution of cities across population sizes classes

Distribution of cities across population sizes classes. Source: MOUD (2010, Rating of Cities) 


The country was divided into five zones: North, South, West, East and North East and Central and South Central, and each zone had a mix of cities ranging from approximately 70 to 10 cities.

Figure 2: Distribution of states in 5 zones for rating exercise. Source: MOUD (2010, Rating of Cities)

Distribution of states in 5 zones for rating exercise. Source: MOUD (2010, Rating of Cities)


The survey agencies were selected for five zones that covered all 423 cities. The rating agencies were provided extensive guidance and training on the methodology before the survey operations. The Ministry closely monitored the city surveys and field visits undertaken by the agencies.

The rating exercise involved three categories of indicators (see also general indicators to measure progress and performance):

  1. Output indicators: pertain to the city having achieved certain results or outputs in different dimensions of sanitation ranging from behavioural aspects and provision, to safe collection, treatment and disposal without harm to the city’s environment. There are nine main output-indicators accounting for 50 points of the total of 100 points.
  2. Process related indicators: pertain to systems and procedures that exist and are practised by the city agencies to ensure sustained sanitation (see also demand creation, decision making tools, and ensuring sustainability. There are seven main process-indicators accounting for 30 points of the total of 100 points.
  3. Outcome related indicators: include the quality of drinking water and that of water in water-bodies of the city, as also the extent of reduction in sanitation-related and water-borne diseases in the city over a time period (see also water quality testing, pathogens and contaminants). There are three main outcome-indicators accounting for 20 points of a total of 100 points.

Ideally, city authorities regularly collect data for the above outputs, processes and outcomes (see also baseline data collection). But at present, very few cities will have, at best, partial data available. This rating exercise will help in highlighting the need for regular data-collection and monitoring of indicators.

Figure 3: City colour codes and categories. Source: MOUD (2010, Rating of Cities)

City colour codes and categories. Source: MOUD (2010, Rating of Cities) 


The Government of India (GoI) has laid out clear steps for cities and states on how they must improve sanitation, and the process they must follow before they can apply for the awards. Clearly, there has to be greater involvement, participation, and ownership from states in making their cities and urban spaces healthier and more liveable.

Factsheet Block Title
Steps to Achieve “Nirmal Shehar” Awards
Factsheet Block Body

(Adapted from RAMAN 2012)

Step 1: Formation of City-wide Sanitation Plan and City Sanitation Campaign

A comprehensive baseline will guide the city sanitation campaign to mobilise stakeholders and raise awareness on 100 per cent sanitation. Based on the baseline, the city will draw up and implement with support from state government and GoI, a comprehensive City Sanitation Plan to reach the goal of becoming a Nirmal Shahar (exemplary city).

Step 2 : Implementation of Plan

The city will implement its city-wide Sanitation Plan to address gaps identified in the baseline and address goals set out in the NUSP, prioritising areas needing urgent attention, and implementing long-term plans. 

Step 3 : Achievement of Milestones

Cities and urban areas that achieve sanitation outputs and outcomes and have systems and procedures in place to sustain these, will apply to their state governments for verification and nomination for the national award.

Step 4 : State-level Verification and Rewards

The state government is responsible for supporting and supervising its cities to implement above steps. A State-level reward scheme (optional) may be instituted to promote competition among urban areas and launch state-level awareness campaigns to support cities’ efforts (e.g. media campaigns with posters and flyers, radio, video or internet and email).

Step 5: State Recommendation to the Government of India

Based on thorough verification of applicant cities’ claim to the National Nirmal Shahar Award, the state government will recommend cities meeting the reward criteria, annually to the MoUD, GoI.

Step 6: Government of India Verification

The MoUD will commission verification missions and independent evaluators or teams to verify cities’ claims.

Step 7 : Criteria for Rewards

The National Urban Sanitation Advisory Group, constituted by MoUD, will be responsible for setting out and revising criteria for the Nirmal Shahar Puraskar. This Committee will be the final authority in deciding annual awards to applicant cities.

As the rating in the first year only covers 441 cities, cities which have taken the initiative and have successfully implemented sanitation improvements in the past year will be recognised for their achievements under a special honour category in the coming year. The rating is funded by GoI and will be scaled-up to cover all 5161 urban centres. The rating and rewards scheme will be an annual event, serving as an effective benchmark to monitor progress, and allow for healthy competition and thorough introspection around goals of the NUSP.

المراجع

National Urban Sanitation Policy

This document describes the framework set by the Government of India to meet its overall goal of transforming urban India into community-driven, totally sanitised, healthy and liveable cities and towns.

MOUD (2008): National Urban Sanitation Policy. New Delhi: Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD). URL [Accessed: 18.06.2019]
قراءات أخرى

National Urban Sanitation Policy

This document describes the framework set by the Government of India to meet its overall goal of transforming urban India into community-driven, totally sanitised, healthy and liveable cities and towns.

MOUD (2008): National Urban Sanitation Policy. New Delhi: Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD). URL [Accessed: 18.06.2019]
مواد تدريبية

Rating of Cities. Rewards, Sanctions and Benchmarking. Serie: WSSCC Global Forum on 10th October at Mumbai

This presentation is about the National Urban Sanitation Policy of India and especially about the rating of cities: i.e. the methodology and results of the rating in 2010.

NIVEDITA, E.P. RAMAN, V. (2011): Rating of Cities. Rewards, Sanctions and Benchmarking. Serie: WSSCC Global Forum on 10th October at Mumbai. New Delhi: Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD) and the Water and Sanitation Programme (WSP) URL [Accessed: 20.10.2012]

Alternative Versions to